Choosing between roofing tar and silicone coatings hinges on climate, roof type, expected lifespan, and maintenance needs. This article compares roofing tar and silicone coatings across durability, installation, cost, environmental impact, and best-use scenarios, helping property owners and contractors make informed decisions for asphalt, flat, and low-slope roofs.
What Is Roofing Tar?
Roofing tar, often referred to as asphalt or coal tar, is a sticky, viscous substance used to seal and waterproof roofs. It is typically applied hot or cold and forms a flexible, weatherproof barrier once cured. Tar products have long been used on low-sloped roofs, roofing joints, and flashing. They are known for strong adhesion and resistance to water intrusion when applied correctly. However, tar can become brittle in extreme cold and may require frequent maintenance in harsh environments.
What Is Silicone Roofing Coating?
Silicone roofing coatings are elastomeric sealants derived from silicone polymers. They cure to a durable, flexible, waterproof layer that resists ponding water and UV radiation. Silicone coatings are commonly applied as a thin, reflective layer over existing roofing systems, including single-pply membranes and built-up roofs. They offer excellent chemical resistance, long service life, and minimal maintenance when properly installed. A key advantage is their ability to tolerate dynamic roof movement without cracking.
Durability and Lifespan Compared
Durability varies by roof type, climate, and maintenance. Tar-based systems can provide robust waterproofing for decades in moderate climates but may require periodic reapplication due to UV degradation and temperature cycling. In extreme heat, tar can soften; in freezing conditions, it can crack if not properly cured. Silicone coatings typically provide 15 to 25 years of service with proper surface preparation and adhesion checks, and some formulations exceed 25 years in favorable conditions. Silicone’s UV stability and elasticity often translate to longer intervals between maintenance visits.
Waterproofing Performance
For standing water and ponding conditions, silicone coatings perform strongly due to their hydrophobic nature and seamless surface. They resist water intrusion and are less prone to pinhole leaks compared with some tar applications. Tar provides excellent initial waterproofing when applied correctly, but over time, surface wear, cracking, or improper substrate preparation can compromise sealing. Silicone’s seamless film reduces the risk of joint leaks, especially on flat roofs or low-slope surfaces.
Weather Resistance and Climate Considerations
Climate affects both options. Tar may perform well in arid or temperate climates with moderate temperature swings but can struggle in extreme cold or heat, leading to surface cracking or softening. Silicone coatings excel in sunny, hot, and humid environments due to high UV resistance and thermal stability. In coastal or high-chemical-exposure areas, certain silicone formulations resist salt spray and environmental pollutants better than tar-based systems.
Don’t Overpay for Roofing Services – Call 877-801-4315 Now to Compare Local Quotes!
Application and Installation
Tar installation requires careful handling of hot asphalt, safety gear, and adequate ventilation. It’s typically applied in rolls or mopped layers and may need multiple coats for full coverage. Surface preparation is critical to ensure adhesion to the substrate. Silicone coatings are spray-applied or roller-applied over a properly cleaned and primed surface. They cure to form a seamless, flexible membrane. Application windows, cure times, and environmental conditions influence project timelines; rain and humidity can delay silicone curing and tar setting.
Adhesion, Substrates, and Compatibility
Tar adheres well to asphaltic and mineral surfaces but may struggle on highly smooth or non-fibered substrates. Proper surface priming is essential to prevent delamination. Silicone coatings require a clean, dry, and compatible substrate, often with a primer on porous or challenging surfaces. Silicones bond well to many roof membranes but may have adhesion issues on certain bituminous products without compatible primers. A pre-installation assessment by a roofing professional is advised to avoid future failures.
Cost and Life-Cycle Value
Initial cost considerations involve material price, surface preparation, and labor. Tar installations can be less expensive upfront on some projects, but ongoing maintenance costs may accumulate over time due to reapplication needs. Silicone coatings generally carry higher initial costs but offer longer service life, reduced maintenance, and energy-saving benefits from reflective properties. A life-cycle cost analysis should include labor, materials, downtime, and potential roof rehabilitation needs if failures occur.
Maintenance, Repairs, and Downtime
Tar-based roofs require ongoing maintenance to address cracking, blistering, and surface wear. Localized repairs may be possible, but widespread deterioration often necessitates re-tarring or transitioning to a different system. Silicone-coated roofs demand less frequent maintenance, with inspections focused on adhesion integrity and any ponding-related issues. Damaged silicone membranes can usually be repaired with compatible sealants or patch products, preserving the overall waterproof barrier and minimizing downtime.
Environmental and Safety Considerations
Tar products can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during application and curing, presenting safety concerns for workers and nearby occupants. They also pose disposal considerations consistent with bituminous products. Silicone coatings are generally low-VOC once cured and are widely regarded as environmentally friendlier options. Both systems require proper handling, ventilation, and adherence to local code requirements and manufacturer guidelines.
Best-Use Scenarios
- <strongTar is often favored for existing asphaltic roofs needing quick, economical restoration, especially where joints and flashings require robust sealing and where extreme sun exposure is less of a concern.
- Silicone coating shines on flat or low-slope roofs needing long-term waterproofing, UV resistance, and easy maintenance, particularly in regions with heavy sun or chemical exposure.
Common Myths Debunked
- Myth: Tar lasts longer than silicone. Reality: Silicone often offers longer service life in many climates, with less maintenance required over time.
- Myth: Silicone cannot be applied over damaged roofs. Reality: Many silicone systems are designed for retrofit over existing membranes, but proper assessment is essential.
- Myth: Tar is more environmentally friendly. Reality: Tar can emit VOCs during application; silicone coatings tend to be lower in VOCs once cured.
Choosing The Right System
To select between roofing tar and silicone, consider climate, roof condition, flood risk, and maintenance capacity. Conduct a substrate inspection to determine adhesion potential and required surface treatment. Request a formal assessment from a licensed roofer that includes a condition report, cost estimate, and a projected lifespan. For property owners seeking long-term waterproofing with UV resistance and lower maintenance, silicone coatings often offer superior value. For budget-conscious projects with existing bituminous roofs requiring quick sealing, tar may be appropriate if installed by experienced professionals.